top of page
Search

📰 Why Data-Driven Indices Differ from Traditional Benchmarks

  • Rolando Rivera
  • Nov 10
  • 2 min read

Understanding the Landscape


Financial planners and analysts at firms such as Morgan Stanley, Raymond James, and Merrill Lynch rely on well-established market indices and data feeds when making investment recommendations for clients. These professionals use standardized equity indices like the S&P 500, Russell 2000, and MSCI World, along with licensed market data from platforms such as Bloomberg, Refinitiv, and FactSet.


These data sources are regulated, transparent, and form the benchmarking foundation for nearly all client-facing investment guidance in the wealth management industry.


Standard Data Sources in Practice


Financial advisors use traditional indices to:


  • Benchmark portfolio performance

  • Evaluate sector and style exposure (e.g., large-cap growth vs. small-cap value)

  • Compare client allocations to risk-adjusted market baselines

  • Measure performance relative to widely accepted standards


These indices are governed by committees and follow documented methodologies:


  • S&P Dow Jones Indices: S&P U.S. Indices Methodology

  • FTSE Russell: Russell U.S. Indexes Construction and Methodology

  • MSCI Inc.: MSCI Index Calculation Methodology


Each is designed for consistency, transparency, and comparability, not for generating alpha or tactical outperformance.


The Fintech Wave Approach: A Different Kind of Index


By contrast, Fintech Wave Alpha (FWA) and Fintech Wave Bravo (FWB) are fintech-engineered indices designed for innovation, responsiveness, and measurable alpha capture.


Unlike traditional benchmarks that mirror market capitalization and committee selection, FWA and FWB are algorithmically managed, reflecting dynamic market data from multiple fintech APIs (e.g., Alpha Vantage, yFinance, and proprietary analytics).


Feature comparison between indices
Feature comparison between indices

FWA and FWB emphasize long-term compounding and stable growth.



Why the Difference Matters


The distinction between fintech indices and standard benchmarks matters for investors, advisors, and analysts alike:


  • Financial planners are bound by firm compliance to use licensed, standardized benchmarks when issuing recommendations.


  • Fintech indices, like FWA and FWB, serve as performance analytics tools and innovation benchmarks, not client advisory standards.


  • Their purpose is to illustrate new forms of data-driven market interpretation, complementing — not replacing — the established indices used in fiduciary contexts.



Disclaimer


The Fintech Wave Alpha (FWA) and Fintech Wave Bravo (FWB) indices are proprietary, fintech-driven performance models developed for analytical and educational purposes. They are not registered benchmarks under S&P Dow Jones Indices, FTSE Russell, or MSCI methodologies and are not used by licensed financial advisors or planners at firms such as Morgan Stanley, Raymond James, or Merrill Lynch for making client-specific recommendations.



References


  1. S&P Dow Jones Indices, S&P U.S. Indices Methodology, March 2025. spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/methodologies/methodology-sp-us-indices.pdf

  2. FTSE Russell, Russell U.S. Indexes Construction and Methodology, August 2025. lseg.com/content/dam/ftse-russell/en_us/documents/ground-rules/russell-us-indexes-construction-and-methodology.pdf

  3. MSCI Inc., MSCI Index Calculation Methodology, February 2025. msci.com/indexes/documents/methodology


© 2025 Fintech Trades. All rights reserved.



 
 
 

Comments


 

Investing information software developed by Market Leader Game LLC.


Content of this web site is for information and education purposes only. Conclusions and opinions are not certified trade recommendations.

bottom of page